Sunday, 10 April 2011

How to frame Charges and How to Defend Departmental Inquiry

        I have got thousand e-mail from the guys who face vigilance cases to solve their problems. So I take the matter my personal attention. This post is basically the result of 23 years of teaching the material to vigilance matters. The material in this post is written for persons who suffer vigilance case. I hope, they will follow it to become successful. Appeal remedy will be published  latter.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Receipt And Disposal of Complaints - Sources of Information

Information about corruption, malpractices or misconduct on the part of public servants may come to light from any source, such as:
  1. Complaints received by an administrative authority;
  2. Complaints received in the Central Vigilance Commission;
  3. Complaints received or intelligence gathered by the Central Bureau of Investigation and by Police authorities;
  4. Departmental inspection reports and stock verification surveys;
  5. Scrutiny of annual property statements;
  6. Scrutiny of transactions reported under the Conduct Rules;
  7. Reports of any irregularities in accounts revealed in the routine audit of accounts e.g. tampering with records, over-payments, misappropriation of money or materials, etc.;
  8. Audit reports on Government accounts and on the accounts of public undertakings and other corporate bodies, etc.;
  9. Report of Parliamentary Committees like the Estimates Committee, Public Accounts Committee and the Committee on Public Undertakings;
  10. Proceedings of the two Houses of Parliament;
  11. Complaints and allegations appearing in the press, etc.

No comments:

Post a Comment